🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a increasing group of states are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our children's youth". The policy could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Previously, momentum grew behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration pledged to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who was lost after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are safe and fit for young users," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the state government level due to federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed measures mandating parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain individuals to follow Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this international discussion continues, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments globally are increasingly willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.